Spirituality and Democracy 3

The Voices of Hatred will be Silenced when the Voices of Unconditional Love are Respected

Mar 14, 2025

Check my Chat Threads for the latest article updates and see the Index of Articles for all articles in this series.

The practical value of this teaching is obvious when we can experience everyday events in the Now of Word. It is also called the now of our world conscience (suneidesis),1 where the voices of unconditional love speak. Time does not fly here; it does not exist here, while simultaneously we are also moving in a physical reality centered on time. Politics is part of the Now of Word when our conscientious reality oversees our physical reality. When it does not, a money-time reality oversees our suneidesis, where the voices of hatred speak. This veils us from the timeless interaction between Name and Word in the exquisite light of our world suneidesis.

Politics in the Now of Word is about spiritual justice, which encompasses racial justice, gender justice and so on, without forcing us to know each other according to physical attributes. We are quite capable of knowing each other in our symbolic form in the light of Name while working with issues created by our physical differences. For the singularity of our light in democracy is a position of strength in Word. With it, we can examine the political crisis today and respond wisely (see The Spiritual Story of Democracy).

Review

Spirituality and Democracy 2 introduced the all-important knowledge of seeing the form of Name’s light symbolically. It is the basis for getting to know each other according to our symbolic form in Name’s light. Without it, The Practical Guide makes no sense and our collective vision of democracy cannot develop beyond its partial misuse of capitalism. See Capitalism in the Democracy of our Suneidesis.

Understanding our symbolic form in the light of Name, we see the value in blessing those of us using illusory boundaries in limited agapé (love). If we cannot see this value, we do not grasp our singularity and remain in our own illusory boundaries, passed down to us generationally through our own lineage or another’s. We do not have to be blind to the singularity of our democracy in the world suneidesis, or its position in the interaction between Name and Word’s exquisite light, or to others’ blindness to it in the current political crisis.

Envisioning

To see physically, we simply open our eyes. To see spiritually after learning the basics, we need to envision what is already manifest or will be in our world suneidesis but not visible to us now or then. Knowledge of Word provides us with the testimony of two individuals, David and John, who fully understood this, both translated literally here from Hebrew and Greek, respectively.

“I envisioned You (Name) in the sanctuary to see Your power and Your glory.” (Psalm 63:2) If we envision Name incorrectly, we are only imagining.

“We know that when he (Word) manifests, we will be like him because we will envision him just as he is.” (1 John 3:2) If we envision Word incorrectly, we are only imagining and will not be like Word through the nature of our suneidesis.

This is the nature of spiritual light in our suneidesis, transforming us into it when we understand it and can use it to see it from our position permeating it. Seeing Name and its memory in the Now of Word, by seeing with it, transforms us into its light. This is key: not seeing alone, but envisioning our symbolic forms in Word to have them triggered into indescribable forms to see with, in and of the light of Name.

Seeing ourselves according to physical attributes carries over into how we incorrectly envision Name and Word. And this leads to the main error of thinking that agapé can be directly experienced in our human forms, even directly expressed in our human faces. But the nature of our experience as bodily names of agapé light works in a singularity in the Now of Word in the unlimited agapé light of Name. It is beyond our individual or collective physical experience, but we can each experience it directly in our suneidesis and express it indirectly through our physical body. Unless we envision and see Name and Word with this singularity of their agapé light, we are envisioning them and each other incorrectly.

Symbolic Forms of Agapé

Words, of course, cannot describe the actual form of Name’s agapé light, much less their eternal life stories. So to help us envision the visual pattern of agapé, knowledge of Word provides us with the dimensions of Word’s permeating light through two symbols: double light-folds and a glass cube. By envisioning our singularity in these forms of Word’s agapé light, we can symbolically see each other and trigger vision of Word’s manifestation in the story light of our world suneidesis (see the Spiritual Screenplay). It is beyond all description with our languages, for one, because it is part of the Now of Word. If it is correct up to this point, we can use it to see with and are just one step away from envisioning Word interacting with Name in their timeless exquisite light, and those of us participating blindly. This underlies all growth of our agapé.

Preparing to Envision the Exquisite Light

The phrase double light-folds indicates that our unfolded light permeates each other and forms light-folds that permeate each other in double light-folds, together, four bodily names of agapé light. They coalesce into single formations that work in the form of the symbolic glass cube, which is held together by six double light-folds, twenty-four bodily names of light, the form of our singularity in the City of Agapé Light. It is organized between us as permeating bodily names in the agapé light of Name, with our personal (adopted) name housing our political, national and world-names from its permeating nucleus.

Each level of the collective part of our personal names consists of massive numbers of double light-folds, but they appear as only one since they all permeate each other in the same position of the cube of light. However, all appear through two or more names in the same position when we take interaction into account. All four levels coalesce into our singularity, our bodily agapé light in Name, working in the exquisite light of the Now of Word. We harm ourselves as members of it—only when misusing it to make ourselves more important.

Laying the Visual Groundwork for Form within Non-Form

As the light of Word, our singularity also exists in each of us since Word exists as the life of each of us. This lays the visual groundwork for our names of light to be manifested in multiple positions simultaneously. Knowledge of Word reveals this about Name with the revelation Name made it rain fire and brimstone from Name in heaven. Name is omnipresent and, in this reality, without form, for form cannot be omnipresent, Name takes countless forms within its omnipresence, each being Name in full. The greatest concentration of forms within Name’s omnipresence with Word is their exquisite light-fold in our double light-folds of cubic glass.

Being in the image of Name through Word, according to knowledge of Word, we each occupy a single omnipresent permeation in them, with countless forms of our name manifest in our omnipresent permeation through Word’s singularity in each of us. This is what makes seeing with Word’s forms possible, for we permeate them already since they are manifest in our omnipresent permeation. Word said, Wherever I am, you will be there too.

The Greek word for brimstone is a variation of the Greek word for God. This reveals that Name’s presence in our blindness has the effect of brimstone, the burning effect present when trying to misuse agapé in our singularity, denying us access to the blessed agapé in the exquisite light of the Now of Word. This happens when we make ourselves more important knowingly to take advantage of someone. Thus, with our bodily names of agapé light manifesting multiple times in Word—it either multiplies the burning in our world suneidesis or it multiplies the scope of our view of Name’s beauty in its multiple presences with Word in their exquisite light. This knowledge of Word empowers us to start reversing any brimstone working in our suneidesis, agapé by agapé.

Now we are ready to envision and see Word and Name interacting in their timeless exquisite light, which encompasses the democracy light of our world suneidesis, including those of us participating blindly in it.

The Piety Light of Illusion

As explained in The Practical Guide, we bless those of us who are blind (implying blinder than ourselves since we all have a blind part to some degree, free from addiction or not) for who they are when we can see their illusion of being the source of their own light. It can be envisioned since it works through misuse of three aspects of Name’s light in appearances. In such illusion, we imagine we are able to use time to wrestle Name’s light in the Now of Word. Once free from the illusion, seeing that Name is our source in Word and seeing with this, we can envision others who are not free from it as they are, agapé names, and envision them again in the piety light of Word—blindly wrestling Name in its exquisite interaction with Word. This light is another form of Name’s agapé light in Word—one showing Word appearing as though it were their illusion.

When seeing through the illusion, we see Word’s piety light as agapé light in their exquisite interaction. When we do not, we partake of the illusion and participate in the exquisite interaction blindly, unable to give Name all our agapé through each other. Again, use knowledge of Word to reverse any brimstone in your suneidesis by choosing the principle where you have not already.

Six Key Light-Folds: Participating with Vision in Pairs

To start, we need to envision another name of light through our name of light in an agapé light-fold. Making theirs more important without being against ourselves, we do not allow either light to block out the other—so that we can give Name all our agapé light through theirs as they do the same through us, even when they do so blindly through Word’s piety light. It is already manifest in our world suneidesis, waiting for us to envision. In fact, it is manifest in Name and Word loving each other this way, for their exquisite interaction is our world suneidesis and Word’s piety light is part of it.

Then, we need two more names of agapé light to get a better idea of the visual pattern of agapé in double light-folds. But there is no need to envision this in all its details, which is why the symbolic diagram uses higher symbols to generalize visually. To form all the light-folds, relationships, working between four names of agapé light, each name manifests three times simultaneously in Word’s singularity in its own omnipresent permeation. Then, with all four names of agapé light permeating each other’s omnipresent permeation and forming their agapé light-folds and double light-folds, they form the symbolic glass cube out of them.

All four names form six pairs of agapé light-folds between each other. Two pairs form a double light-fold in cubic glass, the six forming three glass cubes or sets. Each set is a different arrangement between the four names in their light-folds, with all three glass cubes permeating each other as one cubic form in the singularity of Word’s agapé light of names. We all partake of the exquisite interaction between Name and Word in their exquisite agapé light-fold permeating our agapé light-folds. Thus, in substance at least, we all make each other more important individually and collectively in our double light-folds of cubic light.

Each manifestation of our personal name, a bodily agapé name in the light of Name, participates in double light-folds on the political, national and world-name levels through its permeational nucleus. With this expansion, we collectively make each other more important on massive scales permeationally within and between us. But believing that we are limited agapé names of bodily light, we use appearances to form illusory boundaries and experience existence mostly through Word’s piety light.

A Detailed Example

Let’s take the personal name of agapé light Hannah, with the political, national and world-name Likud Jew Israeli, Hanna LJ Israeli (see 10 World-Names). In one double light-fold set of cubic glass, let’s say Hannah pairs up with the personal name of agapé light Aaliyah, expanded to Hamas Muslim Palestinian, Aaliyah HM Palestinian. Let’s say the second pair of this set is between the personal names of agapé light Emma and Anahita, expanded to Republican Christian American, Emma RC American, and National-Front Muslim Iranian, Anahita NFM Iranian, respectively.

In the second double light-fold set of cubic glass, permeating the other two, Hannah and Emma are paired in their relationship and, in its other light-fold, Aaliyah and Anahita are paired in theirs. In this arrangement, it is easy to see that each pair has similar illusory boundaries, neither pair making the other more important as they appear in Word’s piety light.

The third double light-fold set of cubic glass shows Hanna and Anahita in one light-fold and Emma and Aaliyah in the other. The illusory boundaries are not as strong here and in the first set compared to the second, but they are not lost with all three sets permeating each other, instead, revealing the contours of these boundaries. They are seen in each of the four agapé names through the triple light-folds working across all three glass cubes as one. Hannah sees Emma, Anahita and Aaliyah in a triple light-fold, as the other three see the others likewise across the three double light-fold sets of cubic glass. It shows that their illusory boundaries are multilayered. But in Word’s singularity, the single cubic form of these agapé names of light never loses its good boundaries in Name’s agapé light.

The pattern continues with each additional name of agapé light revealing more of the depths of the permeational nucleus of all positions, always manifest in and of the exquisite light pattern of their world suneidesis. Once envisioned with the agapé light of our mind, it is triggered with the agapé light of our heart, the mind of our heart, for us to see and see with as an immeasurable part of Name’s City of Agapé Light. Like infinitely-deep facets of a perfect diamond, everyone reflects Word’s crystalline face of Name’s agapé light reflecting in it, in and between each other.

Participating Blindly in Pairs

Focusing on the piety blindness in Hannah, the illusion in appearances, we can follow the practical guide and cleanse the eyes of our heart to see and bless her for who she really is, a bodily agapé name paired in Word’s singularity sets in the light of Name. We can recognize that, when she expresses hateful anger against anyone who threatens her loved ones, it is her misuse of Name’s healthy anger against her. For she refuses to make all others more important and spiritually mature by using agapé-anger stronger than death to protect her loved ones. She thus suffers by experiencing Name’s agapé for her as brimstone in its anger for her. Name does not pour its agapé as brimstone. We turn it into such coals. She amplifying it by blaming Aaliyah in their double light-folds, who, doing the same in return, puts them in an endless exchange of piety light rising up in the contours of their double light-fold sets of cubic glass.

When we make Hannah and Aaliyah more important in our double light-folds of cubic glass with them—through the political, national and world singularities in Word—Name’s healthy anger for them works through our desire to see Name and its memory in them in the Now of Word. It empowers us to give Name all our agapé through them in the singularities we share, obviously not through our personal names unless we personally know such women. At the same time, all of our agapé light-folds with them manifest in the exquisite agapé light-fold between Name and Word and again, to different degrees, in Word’s piety light. This is one of the ways to find practical value in this teaching, experienced through world events that effect our everyday events in the Now of Word.

Now there is not any real political opposition between parties in Iran or Palestine, so for Anahita and Aaliyah to have the political names National Front and Hamas, respectively, does not necessarily mean they are are under political illusion in Word’s piety light. For they may just be using these names as a means of survival. With political opposition in Israel and the United States though, Hannah and Emma are most likely, in truth, a Likud party member and Republican, respectively.

However, there are strong autocratic leanings in both of these parties due to religious beliefs favoring kings over democracy. Hannah and Emma may be blind to this or openly for or against it. The question is whether they use the principle first and not moral standards in their world suneidesis. If not, they are blinded by political moral standards governing their thoughts and feelings, working through political illusion that addicts many to judging others.

King David loved his enemies, but none of the other Israeli kings in history did. They all blindly wrestled Name by knowing themselves only as living souls and not life-giving spirit, who have multiple forms in their formless light in Word, agapé names in the democratic kingdom of Name.

Again, because we wrestle Name thinking we are our own source, this endless exchange of piety light between these four names rises up in the contours of our double light-fold sets of cubic glass. But again, if we are free from the illusion, seeing that Name is our source in Word and seeing with this, we can envision those who are not free from it as they are, agapé names, and envision them again in the piety light, triggering their light into indescribable beauty in Name’s City of Agapé Light.

A Vision of the City of Agapé Light

Now in the fulfillment of the times of nation-names, we are presently witnessing the historic completion of the boundaries between the double light-folds of our nation and world-names — according to Word’s political singularity in our world suneidesis. Look into the permeational world depths of Word’s political singularity. Word’s symbolic pearl light guides our vision through these depths constructing agapé boundaries in Name’s City of Agapé Light and, within them, constructing piety boundaries. The cubic glass singularities of Word’s world suneidesis use both levels of these transparent boundaries to display where the iridescence of its political singularity unites agapé names and where it polarizes members of the blind piety light within it.

Superseded

By consciously participating in the exquisite exchange between Name and Word in the City of Agapé Light, our desire is fulfilled and we are completely pleased with one another through them. When blind to this though in the piety light of the City of Agapé Light, the mind of our heart is superseded here by Word being our life, showing us consciously participating anyway.

Envisioning Hannah, Aaliyah, Emma and Anahita superseded in their double light-folds of cubic light is no different than seeing them simultaneously as names of agapé light and names of piety light, except that, as superseded agapé names, they see Name in Word perfectly as we do there. For there, neither of us have any blindness. It rests on how well we envision Word in each other without any blindness in us, that is, how well we can receive Name’s agapé in Word for us, for that alone empowers us to see with it and have such agapé for all.

With the principle, the very thought of each other empowers us to receive Name’s agapé and envision each other with Word in the City of Agapé Light, including every superseded presence. Without the principle, every thought of each other blinds us to our superseded participation in it through the misuse of appearances in the illusory city of chaos. This is the symbolic City of Babylon,2 where chaos is the envied lifestyle of its elite in Word’s piety light. Rather than wrestling Name blindly in this city, they have another choice when Word appears to them through our blessing them.

The Spiritual Battle Before Us

The problem before us—in the climax of a world political crisis that has been evolving over two thousands years—is getting those of us who choose the light over blindness to learn how to envision it and see with it. And yet, seeing this as a problem indicates that we who see with it are still not seeing well enough ourselves. Or are we doing all that Word will allow us without others taking that step? The world chases the power of the mind alone, seeking the secrets of the unused brain, while the power of the mind of the heart alone multiples the real secret energy of life, Agapé. The voices of hatred are silenced to the degree the voices of unconditional love are respected.

Memories in our geneses are the Agapé Ships from the past arriving now at the fulfillment of the times of nation-names. Their ancient hulls are pouring out the Now of Word to free us from time in our world suneidesis. Everyday past events are disembarking these bygone ships as New Agapé Worlds. No one need fear standing up in the City of Agapé Light.

Look around, the world is full of blind names in Word’s piety light and seeing names who are after the heart of Name through them.

George Allen

Discussion about this post

Ready for more?