The Spiritual Drama of Democracy
Resolving unresolved stories in our life with the principle
This article is listed as Discussion 4 in the Index of Articles of this series. It is written for readers who have been following previous articles, so if that is not you, please bear with the many links that are added to give you more detail.
Next in our journey, we will pursue knowledge to deepen our understanding of how the structural drama works in the The Spiritual Story of Democracy. The structural drama is agapé light structured for stories to work through. Now that we have knowledge of the genesis of the Now of Word, the gallery of generational personages of character and spiritual moods, we can see their positions in the structural drama and understand how they participate in our spiritual story of democracy.
Inner Vision
We use our inner vision to remove the fear and anxiety associated with uncontrolled images that can afflict our mind. Inner vision is living light that we handle with the mind of our heart. Its essence is unconditional love, agapé, and nothing else, unlike any physical form. Images that can afflict us are formed from the physical light in the world. They cannot work in our inner vision but can seem to veil it when we do not understand them—and we cannot if we have not chosen to see with Word’s agapé light, particularly in the genesis personages of our structural drama.
Choosing agapé as understood in the full principle does not require us to “lower our defenses”. It requires us to replace the nonliving images appearing to work in our defenses, as concerns our well-being and others’, with the living agapé images of Word’s genesis personages, which already work in the inner vision of our singularity in Word and thus its defenses as well. We start with the key names of agapé light in Word’s genesis—David, Abraham and Word itself. Everyone’s genesis has these key positions in their genesis, filled with names of light by the omni-golden Word of our house of knowledge. They form our strongest defense in unlimited agapé stronger than death. Do not continue if you feel that you are not ready to learn this about your inner vision.
Picture Frames
Picture frames are like grammar. They hold pictures and their meaning within boundaries that have little meaning in and of themselves, just as grammar holds words and their meaning in the rule-based boundaries of our suneidesis.1 Word said that we cannot know his words, which he said are spirit and are life, unless we know the gramas of Moses, a Greek word serving as the root for grammar.
Visions of the Three Genesis Personages
Word was not talking about the moral law Moses taught, for Word supplanted it with the principle as the governing force of our suneidesis,2 using the moral code as a guide instead. It was the rule-based thinking that Moses conveyed in his grama-writing, able to communicate rule-based words that can be envisioned in spirit and life. But it requires understanding how Name speaks to us in vision, how Life speaks in vision to the lives in it who seek it.
As knowledge of Word says, “You [Name] spoke in vision to Your beloved ones…[saying in His own words], ‘I have found David My servant; with My holy oil, I have anointed him [to see and speak in vision].” (Psalm 89:19-20) There is no doubt that Name chose David because he loved his enemies, even though he loved them clandestinely, for with the blind devotion of so many to the law during his day, he was simply far ahead of his time.
Word uses the David position in everyone’s genesis to teach us how to envision3 Name. As David said, “I envisioned You (Name) in the sanctuary [of names] to see Your power and Your glory.” (Psalm 63:2) Word uses his own position in our genesis to teach us how to envision4 him, Word, the key to making our agapé grow. As knowledge of Word says: “We know that when he (Word) manifests, we will be like him because we will envision him just as he is.” (1 John 3:2)
And Word uses the Abraham position in our genesis to start and complete the whole process by referring to him symbolically as “the father of many nations”. This is a spiritual reference to Name manifesting all nations in Word. For the body of Word consists of all nations (ethnos), planting the seed with Abraham’s vision and completing it when we can envision David and Word’s visions in it.
Understanding Word through the Grammar of Visions
Some 2,000 years later, we are finally comprehending what Word was talking about when saying that we cannot know his words, which he said are spirit and are life, unless we know the gramas of Moses, in essence, vision gramas. But something needed to come first—movie grammar, not its story grammar, but specifically the screenplay grammar of movies. —As abstruse as this may sound, consider the qualities of matter needed to exist for the technological processes of television and movies to exist and the biological processes of these human bodies to exist to receive their images the way they do.
“Since the creation of the world [respecting the scientific view also from a different perspective], His [Name’s] invisible qualities, both His eternal power and divine nature [for atheists, divine refers to the nature of Life as source beyond us], are clearly perceived, being understood through the things made.” Romans 1:20
This has everything to do with understanding how Name speaks in vision to us by understanding how we have been able to make things that speak to us in vision through these bodies.
Screenplay grammar takes many short passages of a written story and turns them into a series of recorded visual actions with accompanying words and music—that our brain and its memory turn into fluid visual story action that has a plot and story meaning. This works in the structural drama of our house of knowledge but through Word’s limitless mind and memory — being spirit — through the limitations of our brain and its memory. Again, screenplay grammar as a series of movie frames has little meaning in and of itself, but it is essential for framing visions and their meaning for the mind to translate and interpret into its own living vision story.
To see and understand the spiritually-living words that Word speaks, we need to learn the boundaries of rule-based thinking used in the structural drama. It is a natural part of seeing spiritually in stills and story form — in the oneness of Name’s mind and suneidesis in us. Although it was conveyed as part of the Hebrew language that Moses used, we only need to learn the method as Word taught it, which can be conveyed in any language.
We will discuss the necessary words to envision the key personages in our genesis working in the structural drama of the Now of Word, then, speaking in vision, in the spiritual story of our democracy. In the symbolic diagram, use the three gray circles coming out of the universe, depicted as the purplish oval under the rose, to symbolize these three genesis personages, and the large white circle around the figure below them to symbolize the reader, you doing your part in envisioning the spiritual story.
Remember, everything is formed out of the agapé light of our inner vision, seen more beautifully every time.
We will start with the three ruled-based boundaries of the structural drama. Use the three gray circles to trigger vision of the genesis personages in spiritual bodies — formed from these boundaries in the symbolic double light-folds of cubic glass, not in human forms obviously. Word uses them in Name’s symbolic pan-diamond room in the story, so form them humbly as part of Word’s greater singularity of radiant bodily light in which we all participate.
Unlike the process of taking a series of short visual actions that the brain turns into fluid story action, Name’s visions are eternally-fluid stories of agapé light in Word. However, Name created the process in Word through the universe for us to receive it through our physical experience.
All three boundaries work within the timeframe of the Now of Word. Its 2,000-year, forty-two-generation now works in every genesis personage — without distinction between past and present in the world suneidesis, while Name and its memory distinguish them in the world.
Use this knowledge of Word as you envision them permeating each other in the double light-folds of their symbolic cubic glass form. Then, use this to trigger indescribable vision of them in the blind and the magnitude of their agapé light increases immensely in you. It is alluded to in the Section “The Agapé Door That is Two” in Chapter Two of The Spiritual Story of Democracy.
“Using the principle this way (making the story of others outside our house who do not understand the Now of Word more important than our own story inside) luminates its structural drama throughout both sides of their drama.”
The Primary Boundary of the Structural Drama
The primary rule-based boundary of Word’s structural drama is the principle of suneidesis itself. It enables us to envision Word as spirit and life in story form, simply put, making others more important without being against ourselves is the underlying theme of, and needed to correctly see, all of life’s stories. The failure to do so is blindness to the real story.
Visually put, making others more important in story visions makes their story light visible through our own, doubling the magnitude of agapé light in the genesis personages of our structural drama and thus in the spiritual story itself.
The primary boundary is demonstrated in Paul’s actions when he fasted spiritually for others. He said, “Your temptation [was] in my flesh.” Through the structural drama, he bore the spiritual stories that enslaved others to temptation to help them see their vision story and meaning. He said, “Being free from all [things], I myself become a servant to all that I may gain the more [for Word to free also].”
Bearing them in the timeframe of the Now of Word, Paul, through Word and the vision stories of David and Abraham, assisted them in recognizing the role moral standards played in the surface appearances of their past unresolved stories. He, thus, led them to Word to resolve them spiritually with the principle of the structural drama.
The Secondary Boundary of the Structural Drama
The secondary rule-based boundary requires sole usage of the symbolic light-forms of Name, us as names, and Word as the diermeneutes,5 the translator/interpreter of these forms between us. This is to exclude depicting spiritual life in any form based on matter, for they are nonliving in the spiritual sense and cannot permeate each other as living light does. However, both types of forms are in each other in a oneness, including the different forms of their words. The oneness of our two types of bodies and words is not one in the same but an in-each-other oneness.
Word’s words of life and spirit are our spiritual story in Name; the ones coming from our physical bodies can only reflect it. Thus, this boundary helps us understand that even though the divine stories of Name are clearly perceived and understood by the things made—these things are not the divine story itself. Understand this with the genesis positions of Word, David and Abraham. They set up the living boundaries of bodily names of light in the structural drama.
The secondary boundary provides a spatial framework for showing the visual pattern of our bodily agapé light in relation to our physical body and words. Envisioning this relationship exposes its misuse in past unresolved stories. It reveals our unchanging nature as names of agapé light in every relationship, described as light-folds, in the face of the changing levels of blindness to our light-folds in unresolved stories. This includes changes due to age, however, this depends on the level of our knowledge also.6
Such past stories are resolved by understanding how the appearances of our physical experience worked in—but not of—the form and visual patterns of our bodily agapé names and words. In The Spiritual Story, this is permeational blindness in the foyer of our house of knowledge — thinking it clearly sees the permeational pan-diamond room it is in but not of.
With the principle the key boundary of our structural drama, the secondary boundary empowers us to make others’ bodily agapé names and words more important in our stories, without being against our own. This exposes and resolves our perception of past story visions where we made ourselves more important.
Using the key genesis personages as strongholds in the structural drama, realize the importance of everyone’s words and actions in the spiritual story — even though we are not the source of their essence.
We can stop wrestling Name ourselves through others and see who continues to do so (see The Practical Guide). However, they may be wrestling Name as Abraham, David and some of their offspring did, correctly to prove the righteousness of Name.
The Tertiary Boundary of the Structural Drama
The tertiary rule-based boundary reveals the pathways of light for us to give all our agapé to Name through everyone else, tracing the pathways Name uses to give each of us all its agapé through everyone else, both in our bodily and nonbodily forms. This is the purpose of our vision magnitude in the plot of the structural drama, brought to sublime levels by seeing it retrace the pathways at each turn — as we give our agapé with all of our heart, soul, dianoia and strength through different actions. It displays the key ones travelled by the Word, David and Abraham positions in our structural drama.
The three rule-based boundaries of the structural drama empower us to give Name all our agapé especially through the blindest among us, which may have included us at times in past stories (not to imply that we give Name our agapé through ourselves7). It cannot include us in present stories if we have chosen agapé and are at least learning how to see with it.
Recognizing the three levels on which we have all wrestled Name the wrong way makes past errors evident. But now that we have the visual boundaries of our structural drama, we are ready for the grammar of Word’s vision stories of agapé light.
The Spiritual Screenplay
To compare the vision action of spiritual and nonspiritual screenplays, we will examine the passage below from Chapter Two - Mirrored. Remember that we train the story light of our agapé eyes to use our structural drama by keeping both levels of the spiritual screenplay distinct, its reality and illusion. The reality in the pan-diamond room is quite distinct from the illusion in the foyer, the latter where the nonspiritual screenplay exists in the image of the universe. The passage below focuses on the illusion. For focus on the reality, see Discussion 5, Names in The Spiritual Story of Democracy.
All illusion is due to misuse of our awareness of the aspects of Name’s light, explained in The Practical Guide, and given a place in the story of light by Word forming the illusion of the misuse out of the jasper transparency of its piety light. Once it is formed, we “put it on” and use it to wrestle Name in the part of the duality name designating us spiritually dead.
Name’s reality manifests in the part designating us spiritually alive, and thus the duality name is key for us to train our senses to use Word’s structural drama, as long as we are not bound to it. For aside from its spiritual death, the part designating us spiritually alive works without the peace of the phronéma-mind of the spirit.
Thus, if understood with Word’s knowledge of the mind of our heart, the duality name trains us to stay aware of and keep the illusion and reality distinct. We can perceive Word’s jasper piety light in the illusion and its normal beauty in the reality, even as it exists in Name and Word’s exquisite light-fold in all our double light-folds. This includes our double light-folds with those bound to the duality name, as long as we can see them completely aware of Name in the supersession.
The nonspiritual screenplay works with physical actions and words that depend on the illusion and reality for meaning but cannot manifest either. The spiritual screenplay works with the illusion and reality manifested as the actions and words of spiritual life and death, expressed secondarily in physical actions and words. While the physical body acts and produces words, the spiritual body is words in different word actions.
Thus, to understand Word through the grammar of visions, the spiritual screenplay board plans out how names permeate each other in their cubic light-folds as spiritual words defined accordingly. The duality name is used to distinguish actual permeations as they are used inseparably from their false appearance. It frees the mind of our hearts to use every word permeation of The Spiritual Story to give Name all our agapé through everyone free from illusion.
Excerpt from Chapter Two - Mirrored
Bending and twisting itself back far enough—by the will of one name of light in each of its camps (Republicans and Democrats)—their national suneidesis sees into its own opaque dream and allows both names to envision themselves as God, one literally in a sense, the other figuratively by believing that they can bring peace without the principle. Ruling over the others in their respective camps, they each have a plan to surreptitiously enslave the collective visions of both camps. Forming their respective visions of enslavement on the walls of the foyer, each one enthrones the other as its jasper antichrist of blindness.
Both types of screenplays work from these short-worded actions: a) bending the light of the national suneidesis, b) two members seeing its illusion, c) both partaking of it to somewhat play God, d) planning its use to enslave others, and e) each forming an image of the other as the jasper antichrist to hide behind.
In the nonspiritual screenplay, this series of five short-worded actions is made into a series of recorded visual actions using two human forms, perhaps with accompanying words, sound effects and music. Watching it with our physical eyes, our brain and its memory turn it into one fluid visual sequence of actions that is part of the main plot. Translated and interpreted with the unseen illusion and reality of Name, we give it meaning as a vision story of nonliving light and sound in but not of our suneidesis.
In the spiritual screenplay, we first, with our mind and its memories, envision the written or oral sequence—or the completed movie sequence with human forms, or even the illusory vision story of it already formed in our brain—according to the rule-based boundaries of our structural drama. It centers itself in Name around the bodily agapé names in the David, Abraham and Word genesis-positions.
In the double light-folds of their cubic glass form, the occupants of these positions in Word’s singularity permeate each other as words of Word in a multitude of ways, according to the spiritual source activity of the five short-worded actions.
As we envision Word forming this in Name’s pan-diamond room, Word translates and interprets Name’s vision of our sequenced story vision for us in the Now of Word. It reveals Name on our spiritual screenplay board, planning out its role8 in the story’s plot to save the democracy of our world suneidesis or allow it to enter spiritual death in the national duality name.
As the plot changes back and forth in the Now of Word, the rule-based boundaries of Word’s structural drama are directing multi-sequences in Word’s orchestrated permeational waves. Here, in Name’s pandiamond room, most of us spiritual actors are blinded by the nonspiritual screenplay in our imagination. We are focused on our static human story-forms and the devices speaking in vision to us about their story through news, movies, documentaries and so on.
In the duality name, these forms and devices move from one side to the other, distracting us from the primary boundary of the structural drama, the principle. The simultaneous actions of our real story are reduced to a series of short sequences of distortions that convince us that we cannot visualize the spiritual reality and worse, that it probably does not exist. But in the fulfillment of the times of nations, it is time for Word’s knowledge about The Spiritual Story.
The Spiritual Story
Knowledge of Word states that what we need to learn is “taught by the Spirit [of Name] comparing spiritual with spiritual,” not physical with physical as science does or physical with spiritual as the basics of spirituality needs to be taught to make the transition.
To review, framing the spiritual story with the principle as its structural drama, the primary boundary manifests each of us in one of our genesis positions as formless names of agapé light. The secondary boundary manifests our bodily names of agapé light in our genesis positions within our formless presence (the visual groundwork), and the tertiary boundary manifests the light-pathways of Name’s agapé light in our formless presence and in and between us in our bodily presences.
Taking place simultaneously in one absolute position with different permeational levels in our house of knowledge, in pandirectional agapé light with inner and outer vision fields, we, in the Now of Word, according to the primary boundary of genesis names, manifest in the five actions as follows: somewhat like sound, without form, we bend our national light, see its jasper illusion, partake, plan and form it in Name’s orchestrated permeational waves. It is all translated and interpreted for us first by Word, comparing spiritual with spiritual in The Spiritual Story of Democracy.
Simultaneously, according to the secondary boundary in our world suneidesis, we carry out these simul-actions with our cubic double light-folds within ourselves without form, and in the tertiary boundary, we do so in the pathways in and between us in Name’s orchestrated permeational waves of us. After Word translates and interprets this for us comparing spiritual with spiritual, we do so ourselves comparing physical with spiritual or physical with physical.
Either way, some of us desire to give Name all our agapé, some of us do not, others are unaware of the choice and how it will soon greatly effect the democracy of our world suneidesis.
Under the duality name, the illusion of Word’s jasper piety light appears to have formed two piety names as antichrists, giving meaning to the human story of many as they see democracy. Here, in the opaque foyer of our house of knowledge, both sides misuse the word-symbol evil to attack each other, violating the good boundaries of their relationship in not just the structural drama but spiritual story itself.
On the other side of their duality name, which they are unaware of all of the time except in dreams, they are agapé names in their natural transparencies, giving Name some of their agapé light but not through each other. A peace without Word’s singularity exists here.
This sequence of The Spiritual Story of Democracy is extraordinarily short in our inner vision fields and extraordinarily long in our outer ones, due to the dynamics of the Now of Word. This allows for quick reflection and prolonged contemplation of its great importance in the moving simul-plot. The story oneness between Word’s agapé and piety light illuminates it in the duality name and reveals it in the unresolved sub-stories of every nation-name, working together in every world-name and afflicting every personal name of light. It is The Spiritual Civil War in our world suneidesis.
Envision it in the orchestrated permeational waves as we go, as well as in the image of the universe, where its destructions reigns.
Stretching over 400 hundred years and counting, it includes the unresolved story surrounding the eighteen years of the American Revolution. On the spiritual story board, Name used all sides to form and prepare the United States for World War 2. For without a strong unified U.S., Nazism would have overtaken the world for a thousand years. But none of the participants before, during or since the Revolution have used the principle, from Native Americans, African and White Americans to Englishmen, Spaniards and Frenchmen. Whether from direct actions of hatred or indirect actions of unforgiveness, all sides need to learn how to love the enemies of suneidesis for healing to be complete.
The countless unresolved sub-stories from this have strong illusory boundaries. The actions of jasper antichrists wielding the word-symbol evil guard these boundaries. They give the appearance that limited agapé within some groups forms good boundaries, while they are condemned as evil substance in others. In the end, one group uses hatred stronger than death to unjustly punish another for using the same limited agapé. However, there is reconciliation but only after the principle is embraced, and that is only if the democracy of our world suneidesis survives, escaping the all-knowingness of each other’s little worlds.
What is on Name’s spiritual story board now? Unless we use the principle, it does not matter whether we are fighting for democracy or fascism. Name already saved most of the world from fascism, but blind, we have been ungrateful and reject the principle.
The Bridal Light of Word’s Genesis
On all four levels of our el-elohe-names, we identify as the bride of Name’s golden agapé light in Word’s genesis and stop identifying with the illusion of it in Word’s piety light within. Living in The Spiritual Story of Democracy, we are watching the illusion put boundaries around the bridal light of the City of Agapé Light, known also as the democracy light in our world suneidesis.
As the words of life and spirit that Word is speaking, we are story visions, explaining the spirituality of democracy from the principle, so that we can rise above tolerating those we dislike to save them in our democracy. This is whether Name will have us as its Bride of Agapé Light at this time. Either way, we are suffering many addictions due to tolerating or hating others in our democracy.
Symbolically, we can define the main addiction as national spiritual adultery against our democracy. “Everyone who looks at a woman [the democracy light of the symbolic bride of life] in order to desire her [in the image of the universe because they are spiritually blind and unable to fast spiritually for her] has already committed adultery with her in his heart [against the agapé light of Bridegroom Name].” (Matthew 5:28)
Therefore, with understanding of the spiritual screenplay and story in the eternal power and divine nature of Name (God or Life), we know how Name speaks to us in vision to help us save our democracy perhaps at this impasse. And we know how to respond in vision to do so, declaring that national spiritual adultery corrupts our vision of democracy.
Spiritual adultery reigns in all national and world-names, but it is only a symptom afflicting the structural drama of our spiritual story. Forgive all symptoms and recognize the source problem. Whatever needs to be done can be done correctly only with agapé stronger than life and death.
Suggested Articles:
The Eyes of Democracy (Introduction and Index of Articles)
Suneidesis, pronounced soo-NAY-day-sis, is a Greek word that joins our natural awareness with our sense of conscience. Click on the link for a detailed explanation. It is central to this teaching. Using this foreign word regularly in discussions helps us get accustomed to experiencing something new and positive working in our awareness itself. When the word conscience is used, it will refer to the aspect of suneidesis that involves right and wrong, but this aspect cannot be separated from our co-conscientious awareness of all things.
If I understand that my awareness of something as simple as a cup includes co-conscientiousness, I do not allow myself to get blinded by the cup alone but know it as part of all creation at the hands of the Creator or the universe, depending on one’s beliefs. Spiritual maturity does this naturally.
The repetition of suneidesis is meant to challenge you to consider this dimension in your awareness. Apologies, but it will only be a necessary annoyance until it becomes natural.
Used only some 50 times, the Hebrew word khaza is normally translated "see”, but it is the main root for all the Hebrew words translated "vision". Used some 1,300 times, the Hebrew word raah is not used as the root for vision, so its many occurrences are best translated “see”. Khaza, therefore, is better translated “mentally perceive” or “envision”, but it is not due to their meaning in English carrying ideas such as “it is all in your head”. But nothing can be further from the truth in Hebrew usage. “I envisioned (khaza)You (Name) in the sanctuary [of names] to see (raah) Your power and Your glory.” “You [Name] spoke in vision (khazone, from khaza) to Your beloved ones.”
Among the four main Greek verbs translated “see”, only horaó forms nouns translated “vision”, which, like khaza in Hebrew (see footnote 3), qualifies it to be translated “mentally see” or “envision” also. Unlike khaza and its counterparts though, horaó is used more often than the other three Greek verbs combined. For one of the primary reasons that Word came was to teach us how to envision (horaó) Name in order to see (blepo, main Greek word for see) Him—through envisioning Word, taking David’s teaching to the next level.
Word said, “For judgment I came into this world, that those who do not see (blepo) might see (blepo) [if we learn his teaching, for this is not foremost physical healing of sight but a renewing of the mind and training of the senses], and that those who see might become blind.” (John 9:39) To the leaders of his time, Word said, “And the Father [Name] who sent me [Word], that One has borne witness concerning me. You have neither heard His voice at any time nor have you envisioned (horaó) His form.” (John 5:37)
We know that when he (Word) manifests, we will be like him because we will envision (horaó) him just as he is.” (1 John 3:2)
Diermeneutes (dee-air-main-yoo-tace) is a Greek noun that comes from a verb that requires two English words to translate, meaning ‘to translate’ and ‘to interpret’. As a noun, it is both translator and interpreter. This action of translating works from one’s original language, which, ultimately, is everyone’s spiritual language, used by Name to speak to us in vision. Name’s visions though need to translated for us, even though we both use the same language, and they are simultaneously interpreted for us in the Now of Word. Simply put, Name speaks to us in visions we can understand through Word. Word is our diermeneutes, essential for us to understand The Spiritual Story of Democracy.
Knowledge of Word states: “And beginning from Moses and from all the prophets, he (Word) was translating/interpreting (diermeneuo, verb form) for them the [things] concerning himself in the Scriptures.” (Luke 24:27)
Knowledge of Word states that, as a boy, Jesus had to learn knowledge about good and bad, like everyone else, in order to know and choose the good. In Name’s eyes, none of us are accountable for doing wrong when we do not know it is wrong, unless we refuse to learn and grow. More often than doing wrong purely ignorantly, it appears that many of us simply refuse to learn how to love according to the principle.
For Name gives us all its agapé through others only. What greater way is there to show us agapé than to love us through those around us, the seeing and the blind? Self-love violates the singularity between us in Word.
Necessary blindness is when we blind ourselves because we cannot bear to see ourselves in Name’s presence. We no longer see the agapé in everything Name does for us and everyone else. If we decide to continue blind in life, unable to bear even the thought of Name having nothing but agapé for us and everyone despite our having blinded ourselves, we bury the memory of Name, the goodness of God or Life, and believe that life has no purpose. We exist in smaller and smaller places in our heart and never see the bigger meaning. But the principle of Word restores us.
Thank you George for sharing this with me. I have read and my hearts feels the truth of this teaching. I will continue to read and study though all your shares to understand more.
I do believe that only by loving and knowing we are all here experiencing together will we truly find peace on this earth. And that will take a whole collective. I am not in charge of the whole collective and starting with me, getting clear and knowing this within myself is where I do begin.
Deep writing. If one engages the complexity of what you have written, then a consciousness of clarity is what should occur. Everything is connected…nothing exists in total isolation.